Which statement best supports the view that William was stubborn, brutal, and greedy?

• A. He loved money.
• B. He enjoyed peaceful negotiations.
• C. He was indifferent to power.
• D. He avoided conflict.

Answer: (A)

When judging whether William was stubborn, brutal, and greedy, the crucial idea is what his priorities reveal about motive and behavior. The statement that he loved money directly signals greed—the drive to accumulate wealth. Greed often underlies persistent, aggressive actions aimed at gaining more resources, which can manifest as stubbornness in sticking to goals and brutality in how he achieves them.

The other statements don’t align with those traits as closely. Describing him as enjoying peaceful negotiations suggests a preference for harmony rather than force. Being indifferent to power points to a lack of drive to control or dominate, which contradicts the idea of someone who is stubborn and brutal in pursuit of wealth. Avoiding conflict likewise implies a non-confrontational approach, not the aggressive stance associated with brutality and relentlessness.

So, the statement that he loved money best supports the view, because greed is the clearest indicator of a relentless, forceful approach to securing wealth.